Hi All,
I am trying to implement CommitCRM at our company, and in it's current state, it's not very usable. Some things I believe will not be avoidable, so I've thought of some things and want to know if it's possble or if CommitCRM has an answer for.
Can I create email exclusions for the email connector? I currently have a "catch all" setup so that any emails from our domain is taken intoCommitCRM. However I would like to avoid it from taking in automated emails from our backup services, reports etc that use the same email domain.
Secondly, my reply (from within Commit) feature doesn't seem to work. I want it to reply to the person that sent in the email, but from my testing that is not happening.
Thirdly, duplicate tickets seem to be unavoidable. I figured out how to merge 2 tickets, but I'm running into a problem where I will get about 10 emails about the same thing. Is there a way to do a group merge? Can I select Multiple tickets and join it to 1 master ticket? Doing one at a time is not very convenient in this case.
Thanks,
Wong
I am trying to implement CommitCRM at our company, and in it's current state, it's not very usable. Some things I believe will not be avoidable, so I've thought of some things and want to know if it's possble or if CommitCRM has an answer for.
Can I create email exclusions for the email connector? I currently have a "catch all" setup so that any emails from our domain is taken intoCommitCRM. However I would like to avoid it from taking in automated emails from our backup services, reports etc that use the same email domain.
Secondly, my reply (from within Commit) feature doesn't seem to work. I want it to reply to the person that sent in the email, but from my testing that is not happening.
Thirdly, duplicate tickets seem to be unavoidable. I figured out how to merge 2 tickets, but I'm running into a problem where I will get about 10 emails about the same thing. Is there a way to do a group merge? Can I select Multiple tickets and join it to 1 master ticket? Doing one at a time is not very convenient in this case.
Thanks,
Wong
Comment